PCLC vs SCHD
Polen 5Perspectives Large Growth ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, PCLC or SCHD?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PCLC | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $1M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 39 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +0.79% | +25.88%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +30.22% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.05% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.17% |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.6% | 41.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Polen Capital | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 18, 2026 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
PCLC vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PCLC vs SCHD Performance
Polen 5Perspectives Large Growth ETF (PCLC) is an ETF from Polen Capital and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Year to date, PCLC is up 0.79% versus a gain of 25.88% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PCLC charges 0.50% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $6 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PCLC currently yields 0.00% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 39 holdings in PCLC and 100 in SCHD, totalling 99.8% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, PCLC as of Jun 30, 2026 and SCHD as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in PCLC and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 39 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 99 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for PCLC (99.9% of the fund), and 32 for PCLC that do not appear in SCHD (84.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PCLC and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PCLC or SCHD?
PCLC has an expense ratio of 0.50% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $44 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, PCLC or SCHD?
PCLC yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than PCLC?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.