PFFV vs VOO
Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PFFV | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $304M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.19% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 56 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +2.15% | +13.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.66% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.58% | +21.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.03% | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 22, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
PFFV vs VOO Performance
Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PFFV returned +2.66% while VOO returned +23.01%. Year to date, PFFV is up 2.15% versus a gain of 13.79% for VOO.
Over three years, PFFV compounded at +6.58% per year against +21.78% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +2.03% and +13.39% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs +4.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 8.1% for PFFV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.0% for PFFV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PFFV charges 0.25% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PFFV currently yields 8.19% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
PFFV and VOO share 6 holdings out of 524 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PFFV or VOO?
PFFV has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PFFV or VOO?
Over the past year PFFV returned +2.66% vs +23.01% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), PFFV annualized +4.12% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PFFV or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 8.1% for PFFV. Worst drawdown: PFFV -19.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both PFFV and VOO?
PFFV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PFFV and VOO?
PFFV and VOO share 6 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 524 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PFFV or VOO?
PFFV yields 8.19% while VOO yields 1.09%, so PFFV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.