PFIG vs VTI
Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PFIG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.22% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $116M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.41% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 803 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +0.21% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.72% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.51% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.21% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 15, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
PFIG vs VTI Performance
Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PFIG returned +2.72% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, PFIG is up 0.21% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, PFIG compounded at +5.51% per year against +21.27% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +1.21% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +1.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 4.3% for PFIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.6% for PFIG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PFIG charges 0.22% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $22 vs $3 annually, a gap of $19 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PFIG currently yields 4.41% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PFIG or VTI?
PFIG has an expense ratio of 0.22% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $19 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PFIG or VTI?
Over the past year PFIG returned +2.72% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), PFIG annualized +1.09% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PFIG or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 4.3% for PFIG. Worst drawdown: PFIG -15.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PFIG and VTI?
PFIG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PFIG and VTI?
PFIG and VTI share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3514 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PFIG or VTI?
PFIG yields 4.41% while VTI yields 1.07%, so PFIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.