PLA vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: TiedMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPLAVTIWinner
Expense Ratio1.07%0.03%
AUM$3M$666.9B
Dividend Yield3.65%1.07%
Holdings63,543
YTD Return+6.41%+14.82%
1Y Return-+22.43%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.93%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.34%
Volatility (annualized)-15.4%
Max Drawdown-12.4%-56.6%
Fund FamilyGraniteSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
InceptionMay 19, 2026May 24, 2001

PLA vs VTI Performance

GraniteShares Autocallable PLTR ETF (PLA) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, PLA is up 6.41% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.4% for PLA and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PLA charges 1.07% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PLA currently yields 3.65% against 1.07% for VTI.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PLA or VTI?

PLA has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $104 per year of difference.

Which pays a higher dividend, PLA or VTI?

PLA yields 3.65% while VTI yields 1.07%, so PLA currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.