PLA vs SCHD
GraniteShares Autocallable PLTR ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PLA | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $3M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.65% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +6.41% | +26.54% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +30.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.65% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.4% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | May 19, 2026 | Oct 20, 2011 |
PLA vs SCHD Performance
GraniteShares Autocallable PLTR ETF (PLA) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Year to date, PLA is up 6.41% versus a gain of 26.54% for SCHD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.4% for PLA and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PLA charges 1.07% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $6 annually, a gap of $101 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PLA currently yields 3.65% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PLA or SCHD?
PLA has an expense ratio of 1.07% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $101 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, PLA or SCHD?
PLA yields 3.65% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so PLA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.