PLTA vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPLTAVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.95%0.04%
AUM$7M$79.0B
Dividend Yield4.27%2.86%
Holdings6568
YTD Return-24.17%+15.80%
1Y Return-31.92%+26.12%
3Y Return (annualized)-+18.25%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.51%
Volatility (annualized)-14.6%
Max Drawdown-80.0%-58.8%
Fund FamilyProSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
InceptionSep 8, 2025Nov 10, 2006

PLTA vs VYM Performance

ProShares Ultra PLTR ETF (PLTA) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PLTA returned -31.92% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, PLTA is down 24.17% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -80.0% for PLTA and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PLTA charges 0.95% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $4 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PLTA currently yields 4.27% against 2.86% for VYM.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PLTA or VYM?

PLTA has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $91 per year of difference.

Which performed better, PLTA or VYM?

Over the past year PLTA returned -31.92% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which pays a higher dividend, PLTA or VYM?

PLTA yields 4.27% while VYM yields 2.86%, so PLTA currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.