POWA vs VXUS
POWA vs VXUS
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | POWA | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $177M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.95% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 53 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +3.98% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.59% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.63% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.55% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -47.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 15, 2006 | Jan 26, 2011 |
POWA vs VXUS Performance
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year POWA returned +6.59% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, POWA is up 3.98% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, POWA compounded at +11.63% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +7.55% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, POWA has the edge at +8.75% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.3% for POWA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -47.9% for POWA and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
POWA charges 0.40% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $5 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, POWA currently yields 0.95% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, POWA or VXUS?
POWA has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $35 per year of difference.
Which performed better, POWA or VXUS?
Over the past year POWA returned +6.59% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), POWA annualized +8.75% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, POWA or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.3% for POWA. Worst drawdown: POWA -47.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both POWA and VXUS?
POWA and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between POWA and VXUS?
POWA and VXUS share 2 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7910 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, POWA or VXUS?
POWA yields 0.95% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.