PSCE vs VTI
Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PSCE delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSCE | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $104M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.26% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 33 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +44.13% | +13.38% | |
| 1Y Return | +63.41% | +21.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.32% | +21.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +18.62% | +12.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 40.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -96.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
PSCE vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF (PSCE) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSCE returned +63.41% while VTI returned +21.12%. Year to date, PSCE is up 44.13% versus a gain of 13.38% for VTI.
Over three years, PSCE compounded at +6.32% per year against +21.85% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +18.62% and +12.44% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.10% annualized vs -3.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSCE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 40.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -96.3% for PSCE and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSCE charges 0.29% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSCE currently yields 2.26% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PSCE and VTI share 24 holdings out of 2794 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSCE or VTI?
PSCE has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PSCE or VTI?
Over the past year PSCE returned +63.41% vs +21.12% for VTI, so PSCE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), PSCE annualized -3.64% vs +8.10% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PSCE or VTI?
PSCE has been the more volatile fund at 40.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PSCE -96.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PSCE and VTI?
PSCE and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PSCE and VTI?
PSCE and VTI share 24 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2794 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSCE or VTI?
PSCE yields 2.26% while VTI yields 1.07%, so PSCE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.