PSCX vs VTI
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSCX | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $46M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +7.24% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.45% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.54% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.58% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -10.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 22, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
PSCX vs VTI Performance
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF (PSCX) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSCX returned +12.45% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, PSCX is up 7.24% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, PSCX compounded at +12.54% per year against +21.27% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.58% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, PSCX has the edge at +8.89% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 6.4% for PSCX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.2% for PSCX and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSCX charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSCX currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PSCX and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSCX or VTI?
PSCX has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PSCX or VTI?
Over the past year PSCX returned +12.45% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), PSCX annualized +8.89% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PSCX or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 6.4% for PSCX. Worst drawdown: PSCX -10.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PSCX and VTI?
PSCX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between PSCX and VTI?
PSCX and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSCX or VTI?
PSCX yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.