PSH vs QQQ

PSH vs QQQ

Which is better, PSH or QQQ?

Short Term High Yield Bond against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPSHQQQ
Expense Ratio0.45%0.18%Best
AUM$186M$483.5B
Dividend Yield6.99%0.44%
Holdings474107
YTD Return-1.95%+15.21%Best
1Y Return-1.51%+19.78%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+24.58%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.93%
Volatility (annualized)8.6%Best17.0%
Max Drawdown-14.0%Best-22.8%
$10,000 over 2.7 years$9,831$17,312Best
Fund FamilyPGIM InvestmentsInvesco (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
StyleShort Term High Yield BondLarge Cap Growth
InceptionDec 14, 2023Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 19, 2023 to Sep 16, 2026 (2.7 years).

PSH vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.

PSH vs QQQ Performance

PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year PSH returned -1.51% while QQQ returned +19.78%. Year to date, PSH is down 1.95% versus a gain of 15.21% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 8.6% for PSH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.0% for PSH and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.14. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PSH charges 0.45% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $18 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSH currently yields 6.99% against 0.44% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 347 holdings in PSH and 102 in QQQ, totalling 76.3% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 347 positions we hold weights for in PSH and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 474 and 107.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of PSH and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

PSHQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PSH or QQQ?

PSH has an expense ratio of 0.45% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, PSH or QQQ?

Over the past year PSH returned -1.51% vs +19.78% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, PSH or QQQ?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 8.6% for PSH. Worst drawdown: PSH -14.0% vs QQQ -22.8%.

Should I hold both PSH and QQQ?

PSH and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.14, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, PSH or QQQ?

PSH yields 6.99% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so PSH currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than PSH?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.