PST vs VXUS
ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PST | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $10M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.89% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +7.59% | +14.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.77% | +27.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.31% | +19.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.48% | +9.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -79.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 29, 2008 | Jan 26, 2011 |
PST vs VXUS Performance
ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury (PST) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PST returned +6.77% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, PST is up 7.59% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.
Over three years, PST compounded at +3.31% per year against +19.53% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +10.48% and +9.03% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.83% annualized vs -5.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.3% for PST. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.8% for PST and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.06. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PST charges 0.95% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $5 annually, a gap of $90 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PST currently yields 2.89% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
PST and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PST or VXUS?
PST has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $90 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PST or VXUS?
Over the past year PST returned +6.77% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), PST annualized -5.22% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PST or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.3% for PST. Worst drawdown: PST -79.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both PST and VXUS?
PST and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.06, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PST and VXUS?
PST and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PST or VXUS?
PST yields 2.89% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so PST currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.