PUSH vs VTI
PUSH vs VTI
PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PUSH | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $107M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.77% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 182 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +1.76% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.18% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 0.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -0.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
PUSH vs VTI Performance
PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) is a ETF from PGIM Investments and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PUSH returned +3.18% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, PUSH is up 1.76% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 0.8% for PUSH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -0.8% for PUSH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PUSH charges 0.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PUSH currently yields 3.77% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PUSH and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2830 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PUSH or VTI?
PUSH has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PUSH or VTI?
Over the past year PUSH returned +3.18% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), PUSH annualized +3.66% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PUSH or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 0.8% for PUSH. Worst drawdown: PUSH -0.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PUSH and VTI?
PUSH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PUSH and VTI?
PUSH and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2830 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PUSH or VTI?
PUSH yields 3.77% while VTI yields 1.07%, so PUSH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.