PUSH vs VYM
PUSH vs VYM
PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PUSH | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $107M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.77% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 182 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +1.76% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.18% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 0.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -0.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
PUSH vs VYM Performance
PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) is a ETF from PGIM Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PUSH returned +3.18% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, PUSH is up 1.76% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 0.8% for PUSH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -0.8% for PUSH and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PUSH charges 0.15% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $4 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PUSH currently yields 3.77% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
PUSH and VYM share 0 holdings out of 605 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PUSH or VYM?
PUSH has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PUSH or VYM?
Over the past year PUSH returned +3.18% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), PUSH annualized +3.66% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PUSH or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 0.8% for PUSH. Worst drawdown: PUSH -0.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both PUSH and VYM?
PUSH and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PUSH and VYM?
PUSH and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 605 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PUSH or VYM?
PUSH yields 3.77% while VYM yields 2.86%, so PUSH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.