PXH vs VTI
Invesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PXH delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PXH | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.0B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.26% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 399 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +11.85% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.51% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.03% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.65% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -64.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
PXH vs VTI Performance
Invesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PXH returned +25.51% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, PXH is up 11.85% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, PXH compounded at +22.03% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.65% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +1.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PXH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -64.0% for PXH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PXH charges 0.47% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $3 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PXH currently yields 4.26% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PXH and VTI share 0 holdings out of 3155 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PXH or VTI?
PXH has an expense ratio of 0.47% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PXH or VTI?
Over the past year PXH returned +25.51% vs +21.39% for VTI, so PXH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), PXH annualized +1.85% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PXH or VTI?
PXH has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PXH -64.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PXH and VTI?
PXH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PXH and VTI?
PXH and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3155 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PXH or VTI?
PXH yields 4.26% while VTI yields 1.07%, so PXH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.