PXH vs VOO
Invesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. PXH delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PXH | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.9B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.37% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 401 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +12.43% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.07% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.26% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.04% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -64.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2007 | Sep 7, 2010 |
PXH vs VOO Performance
Invesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PXH returned +25.07% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, PXH is up 12.43% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, PXH compounded at +21.26% per year against +21.55% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.04% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.56% annualized vs +1.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PXH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -64.0% for PXH and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PXH charges 0.47% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $3 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PXH currently yields 4.37% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
PXH and VOO share 0 holdings out of 873 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PXH or VOO?
PXH has an expense ratio of 0.47% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PXH or VOO?
Over the past year PXH returned +25.07% vs +21.63% for VOO, so PXH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), PXH annualized +1.88% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PXH or VOO?
PXH has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: PXH -64.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both PXH and VOO?
PXH and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PXH and VOO?
PXH and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 873 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PXH or VOO?
PXH yields 4.37% while VOO yields 1.09%, so PXH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.