QABA vs VOO
First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. QABA delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QABA | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $92M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.34% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 147 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +22.71% | +13.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.45% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.03% | +21.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.96% | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.5% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -51.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2009 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QABA vs VOO Performance
First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QABA returned +31.45% while VOO returned +23.01%. Year to date, QABA is up 22.71% versus a gain of 13.79% for VOO.
Over three years, QABA compounded at +18.03% per year against +21.78% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +6.96% and +13.39% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs +8.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QABA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.0% for QABA and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QABA charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QABA currently yields 2.34% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
QABA and VOO share 0 holdings out of 665 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QABA or VOO?
QABA has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QABA or VOO?
Over the past year QABA returned +31.45% vs +23.01% for VOO, so QABA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), QABA annualized +8.29% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QABA or VOO?
QABA has been the more volatile fund at 22.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QABA -51.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QABA and VOO?
QABA and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QABA and VOO?
QABA and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 665 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QABA or VOO?
QABA yields 2.34% while VOO yields 1.09%, so QABA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.