QBIF vs SPY
AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QBIF | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.74% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $7M | $821.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +5.25% | +12.22% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +20.83% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.70% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.98% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | AllianzIM | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2026 | Jan 22, 1993 |
QBIF vs SPY Performance
AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF (QBIF) is a ETF from AllianzIM and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Year to date, QBIF is up 5.25% versus a gain of 12.22% for SPY.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.0% for QBIF and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QBIF charges 0.74% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $9 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QBIF currently yields 0.00% against 1.01% for SPY.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QBIF or SPY?
QBIF has an expense ratio of 0.74% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $65 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, QBIF or SPY?
QBIF yields 0.00% while SPY yields 1.01%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.