QBQV vs VYM
AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QBQV | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.74% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $10M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +5.72% | +14.66% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +22.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -6.5% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | AllianzIM | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
QBQV vs VYM Performance
AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETF (QBQV) is a ETF from AllianzIM and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, QBQV is up 5.72% versus a gain of 14.66% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.5% for QBQV and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QBQV charges 0.74% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $4 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QBQV currently yields 0.00% against 2.24% for VYM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QBQV or VYM?
QBQV has an expense ratio of 0.74% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $70 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, QBQV or VYM?
QBQV yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.