QBSV vs VOO
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer5 ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QBSV | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.64% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $26M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +8.72% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | AllianzIM | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2026 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QBSV vs VOO Performance
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer5 ETF (QBSV) is a ETF from AllianzIM and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, QBSV is up 8.72% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.8% for QBSV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QBSV charges 0.64% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $64 vs $3 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QBSV currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QBSV or VOO?
QBSV has an expense ratio of 0.64% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, QBSV or VOO?
QBSV yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.