QBY vs VTI
GraniteShares YieldBoost QBTS ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QBY | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 154.28% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -37.07% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -41.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 25, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
QBY vs VTI Performance
GraniteShares YieldBoost QBTS ETF (QBY) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, QBY is down 37.07% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.4% for QBY and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QBY charges 1.07% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QBY currently yields 154.28% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QBY or VTI?
QBY has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $104 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, QBY or VTI?
QBY yields 154.28% while VTI yields 1.07%, so QBY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.