QBY vs VYM
GraniteShares YieldBoost QBTS ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QBY | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $2M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 118.14% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -37.14% | +16.78% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +24.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -41.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 25, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
QBY vs VYM Performance
GraniteShares YieldBoost QBTS ETF (QBY) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, QBY is down 37.14% versus a gain of 16.78% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.7% for QBY and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QBY charges 1.07% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $4 annually, a gap of $103 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QBY currently yields 118.14% against 2.86% for VYM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QBY or VYM?
QBY has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $103 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, QBY or VYM?
QBY yields 118.14% while VYM yields 2.86%, so QBY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.