QCOC vs QQQ
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - October vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QCOC | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $63M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +8.20% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.34% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.7% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -10.4% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 18, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
QCOC vs QQQ Performance
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - October (QCOC) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year QCOC returned +12.34% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, QCOC is up 8.20% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 6.7% for QCOC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.4% for QCOC and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QCOC charges 0.90% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $18 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QCOC currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
QCOC and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 103 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QCOC or QQQ?
QCOC has an expense ratio of 0.90% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QCOC or QQQ?
Over the past year QCOC returned +12.34% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QCOC annualized +11.67% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QCOC or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 6.7% for QCOC. Worst drawdown: QCOC -10.4% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both QCOC and QQQ?
QCOC and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QCOC and QQQ?
QCOC and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 103 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QCOC or QQQ?
QCOC yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.