QCOC vs VYM
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - October vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QCOC | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $63M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +7.99% | +14.66% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.92% | +22.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.7% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -10.4% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 18, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
QCOC vs VYM Performance
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - October (QCOC) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QCOC returned +11.92% while VYM returned +22.16%. Year to date, QCOC is up 7.99% versus a gain of 14.66% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 6.7% for QCOC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.4% for QCOC and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QCOC charges 0.90% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $4 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QCOC currently yields 0.00% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
QCOC and VYM share 0 holdings out of 604 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QCOC or VYM?
QCOC has an expense ratio of 0.90% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $86 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QCOC or VYM?
Over the past year QCOC returned +11.92% vs +22.16% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QCOC annualized +11.57% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QCOC or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 6.7% for QCOC. Worst drawdown: QCOC -10.4% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both QCOC and VYM?
QCOC and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QCOC and VYM?
QCOC and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 604 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QCOC or VYM?
QCOC yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.