QCON vs VTI
American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, QCON or VTI?
Convertibles against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QCON | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.32% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $24M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.64% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 1 | 3,543 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.6%Best | 15.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.5%Best | -25.4% |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $10,487 | $16,732Best |
| Fund Family | American Century Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Convertible | Equity |
| Style | Convertibles | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 16, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 368 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. QCON has data through Sep 8, 2025 and VTI through Sep 11, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 18, 2021 to Sep 8, 2025 (4.6 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 10.6% for QCON. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.5% for QCON and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QCON charges 0.32% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $3 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QCON currently yields 2.64% against 1.03% for VTI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QCON and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QCON or VTI?
QCON has an expense ratio of 0.32% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, QCON or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 10.6% for QCON. Worst drawdown: QCON -22.5% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both QCON and VTI?
QCON and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QCON or VTI?
QCON yields 2.64% while VTI yields 1.03%, so QCON currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than QCON?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.