IVV vs QCON
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QCON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.32% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $24M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 2.64% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 1 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +5.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +11.45% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | +6.95% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 10.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -22.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | American Century Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Convertible | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 16, 2021 |
IVV vs QCON Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON) is a ETF from American Century Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while QCON returned +11.45%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 5.19% for QCON.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.47% per year against +6.95% for QCON. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs +1.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.6% for QCON. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -22.5% for QCON. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QCON charges 0.32%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $32 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 2.64% for QCON.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QCON?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QCON charges 0.32%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $29 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or QCON?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +11.45% for QCON, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +1.04% for QCON. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or QCON?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.6% for QCON. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QCON -22.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and QCON?
IVV and QCON have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QCON?
IVV yields 1.09% while QCON yields 2.64%, so QCON currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.