QEFA vs VOO
State Street SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, QEFA or VOO?
VOO has been ahead.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QEFA is less concentrated, with 14.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QEFA | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.1B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.75% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 659 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +12.24% | +12.74%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.53% | +19.43%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.99% | +21.18%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.29% | +12.76%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3%Best | 14.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -32.7%Best | -34.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,892 | $18,230Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 14.6%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2014 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 5, 2014 to Sep 8, 2026 (12.3 years).
QEFA vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.3 years both funds cover.
QEFA vs VOO Performance
State Street SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA) is an ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QEFA returned +18.53% while VOO returned +19.43%. Year to date, QEFA is up 12.24% versus a gain of 12.74% for VOO.
Over three years, QEFA compounded at +16.99% per year against +21.18% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.29% and +12.76% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +12.57% annualized vs +5.69%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.8% compared with 13.3% for QEFA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.7% for QEFA and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QEFA charges 0.30% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QEFA currently yields 2.75% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
0.3% of QEFA's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.1% of VOO's money is in holdings QEFA also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
2 positions in common, counted across the 635 positions we hold weights for in QEFA and 504 in VOO, against full books of 659 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 493 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for QEFA (99.3% of the fund), and 12 for QEFA that do not appear in VOO (3.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QEFA and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QEFA or VOO?
QEFA has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QEFA or VOO?
Over the past year QEFA returned +18.53% vs +19.43% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), QEFA annualized +5.69% vs +12.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QEFA or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.8% annualized versus 13.3% for QEFA. Worst drawdown: QEFA -32.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QEFA and VOO?
QEFA and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QEFA or VOO?
QEFA yields 2.75% while VOO yields 1.08%, so QEFA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than QEFA?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QEFA is less concentrated, with 14.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.