QID vs VOO
ProShares UltraShort QQQ vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QID | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $288M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.74% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 21 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -28.02% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | -36.53% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -36.87% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -29.33% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 34.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 11, 2006 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QID vs VOO Performance
ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QID returned -36.53% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, QID is down 28.02% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Over three years, QID compounded at -36.87% per year against +21.47% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -29.33% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs -35.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QID has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for QID and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.88. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QID charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QID currently yields 6.74% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
QID and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QID or VOO?
QID has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QID or VOO?
Over the past year QID returned -36.53% vs +22.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), QID annualized -35.69% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QID or VOO?
QID has been the more volatile fund at 34.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QID -100.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QID and VOO?
QID and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QID and VOO?
QID and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QID or VOO?
QID yields 6.74% while VOO yields 1.09%, so QID currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.