QMFE vs VXUS
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QMFE | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $48M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +10.04% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +16.11% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -11.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 21, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
QMFE vs VXUS Performance
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February (QMFE) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QMFE returned +16.11% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, QMFE is up 10.04% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 8.2% for QMFE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.8% for QMFE and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QMFE charges 0.90% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $5 annually, a gap of $85 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QMFE currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
QMFE and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QMFE or VXUS?
QMFE has an expense ratio of 0.90% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $85 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QMFE or VXUS?
Over the past year QMFE returned +16.11% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QMFE annualized +15.28% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QMFE or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 8.2% for QMFE. Worst drawdown: QMFE -11.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both QMFE and VXUS?
QMFE and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QMFE and VXUS?
QMFE and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QMFE or VXUS?
QMFE yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.