QMNV vs VTI
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - November vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, QMNV or VTI?
Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QMNV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $47M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 10 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +11.01% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.92%Tie | +15.92%Tie |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.83% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.8%Best | 12.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.8%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $13,050 | $13,340Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 15, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 18, 2024 to Oct 2, 2026 (1.9 years).
QMNV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
QMNV vs VTI Performance
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - November (QMNV) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QMNV returned +15.92% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, QMNV is up 11.01% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.6% compared with 7.8% for QMNV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.8% for QMNV and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QMNV charges 0.90% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $3 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QMNV currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QMNV and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QMNV or VTI?
QMNV has an expense ratio of 0.90% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $87 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QMNV or VTI?
Over the past year QMNV returned +15.92% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QMNV annualized +15.04% vs +16.38% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QMNV or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.6% annualized versus 7.8% for QMNV. Worst drawdown: QMNV -12.8% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both QMNV and VTI?
QMNV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QMNV or VTI?
QMNV yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than QMNV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.