QQDN vs VTI

QQDN vs VTI

Which is better, QQDN or VTI?

Opposite sides of the same exposure.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.79, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQDNVTI
Expense Ratio0.95%0.03%Best
AUM$1M$666.9B
Dividend Yield6.02%1.03%
Holdings33,543
YTD Return-20.29%+12.30%Best
1Y Return-23.68%+16.08%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.01%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.36%
Volatility (annualized)41.2%11.8%Best
Max Drawdown-50.2%-8.9%Best
$10,000 over 1.3 years$5,229$12,906Best
Fund FamilyProSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 10, 2025May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 12, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.3 years).

QQDN vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.

QQDN vs VTI Performance

ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega (QQDN) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQDN returned -23.68% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, QQDN is down 20.29% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQDN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 41.2% compared with 11.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.2% for QQDN and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.79. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQDN charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQDN currently yields 6.02% against 1.03% for VTI.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of QQDN and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

QQDNVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQDN or VTI?

QQDN has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, QQDN or VTI?

Over the past year QQDN returned -23.68% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QQDN annualized -39.27% vs +21.68% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, QQDN or VTI?

QQDN has been the more volatile fund at 41.2% annualized versus 11.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QQDN -50.2% vs VTI -8.9%.

Should I hold both QQDN and VTI?

QQDN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.79, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQDN or VTI?

QQDN yields 6.02% while VTI yields 1.03%, so QQDN currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than QQDN?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.79, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.