QQDN vs SCHD
ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, QQDN or SCHD?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQDN | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $1M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 6.02% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 3 | 103 |
| YTD Return | -20.29% | +23.46%Best |
| 1Y Return | -23.68% | +27.20%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.16% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 41.2% | 13.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -50.2% | -4.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $5,229 | $13,139Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 10, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 12, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.3 years).
QQDN vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
QQDN vs SCHD Performance
ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega (QQDN) is an ETF from ProShares and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year QQDN returned -23.68% while SCHD returned +27.20%. Year to date, QQDN is down 20.29% versus a gain of 23.46% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQDN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 41.2% compared with 13.1% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.2% for QQDN and -4.6% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.06. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQDN charges 0.95% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $6 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQDN currently yields 6.02% against 3.00% for SCHD.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQDN and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQDN or SCHD?
QQDN has an expense ratio of 0.95% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $89 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQDN or SCHD?
Over the past year QQDN returned -23.68% vs +27.20% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QQDN annualized -39.27% vs +23.37% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQDN or SCHD?
QQDN has been the more volatile fund at 41.2% annualized versus 13.1% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: QQDN -50.2% vs SCHD -4.6%.
Should I hold both QQDN and SCHD?
QQDN and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.06, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQDN or SCHD?
QQDN yields 6.02% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so QQDN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than QQDN?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.