QQQ vs REK
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs ProShares Short Real Estate
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | REK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.95% | |
| AUM | $455.8B | $12M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 3.22% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 8 | |
| YTD Return | +19.68% | -9.77% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.75% | -7.07% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.25% | -5.10% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.39% | -0.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 16.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -84.8% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | ProShares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Mar 16, 2010 |
QQQ vs REK Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and ProShares Short Real Estate (REK) is a ETF from ProShares. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.75% while REK returned -7.07%. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.68% versus a loss of 9.77% for REK.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +26.25% per year against -5.10% for REK; over five years the annualized figures are +15.39% and -0.12% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.15% annualized vs -9.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 16.0% for REK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -84.8% for REK. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while REK charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $95 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.41% against 3.22% for REK.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and REK share 0 holdings out of 104 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or REK?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while REK charges 0.95%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or REK?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.75% vs -7.07% for REK, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), QQQ annualized +13.15% vs -9.97% for REK. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or REK?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 16.0% for REK. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs REK -84.8%.
Should I hold both QQQ and REK?
QQQ and REK have a monthly-return correlation of -0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and REK?
QQQ and REK share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 104 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or REK?
QQQ yields 0.41% while REK yields 3.22%, so REK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.