QQQ vs RFEM
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF
Which is better, QQQ or RFEM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 5Y and the full window, RFEM over 1Y and 3Y. RFEM is less concentrated, with 38.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RFEM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.99% |
| AUM | $486.1B | $84M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 2.67% |
| Holdings | 107 | 119 |
| YTD Return | +17.54% | +25.92%Best |
| 1Y Return | +25.59% | +40.66%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.63% | +26.08%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.18%Best | +10.88% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.9% | 17.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.1%Best | -45.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,407Best | $16,760 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 38.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jun 14, 2016 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 15, 2016 to Sep 4, 2026 (10.2 years).
QQQ vs RFEM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.2 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs RFEM Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year QQQ returned +25.59% while RFEM returned +40.66%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.54% versus a gain of 25.92% for RFEM.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +24.63% per year against +26.08% for RFEM; over five years the annualized figures are +14.18% and +10.88% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +20.79% annualized vs +9.17%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.9% compared with 17.1% for RFEM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for QQQ and -45.6% for RFEM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RFEM charges 0.99%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $99 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 2.67% for RFEM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 102 holdings in QQQ and 111 in RFEM, totalling 99.9% and 97.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 111 in RFEM, against full books of 107 and 119.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 9 positions for RFEM that do not appear in our book for QQQ (6.8% of the fund), and 96 for QQQ that do not appear in RFEM (97.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and RFEM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RFEM?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RFEM charges 0.99%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $81 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or RFEM?
Over the past year QQQ returned +25.59% vs +40.66% for RFEM, so RFEM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), QQQ annualized +20.79% vs +9.17% for RFEM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RFEM?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 18.9% annualized versus 17.1% for RFEM. Worst drawdown: QQQ -35.1% vs RFEM -45.6%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RFEM?
QQQ and RFEM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RFEM?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RFEM yields 2.67%, so RFEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RFEM better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 5Y and the full window, RFEM over 1Y and 3Y. RFEM is less concentrated, with 38.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.