RFEM vs SCHD
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, RFEM or SCHD?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. RFEM led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, SCHD over the full window. RFEM is less concentrated, with 38.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RFEM | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $84M | $112.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.67% | 3.13% |
| Holdings | 119 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +25.92% | +27.56%Best |
| 1Y Return | +40.66%Best | +30.29% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.08%Best | +16.37% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.88%Best | +10.23% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -45.6% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,760Best | $16,274 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.4%Best | 41.5% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 14, 2016 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 15, 2016 to Sep 4, 2026 (10.2 years).
RFEM vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.2 years both funds cover.
RFEM vs SCHD Performance
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year RFEM returned +40.66% while SCHD returned +30.29%. Year to date, RFEM is up 25.92% versus a gain of 27.56% for SCHD.
Over three years, RFEM compounded at +26.08% per year against +16.37% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +10.88% and +10.23% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.73% annualized vs +9.17%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RFEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 15.1% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -45.6% for RFEM and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RFEM charges 0.99% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $6 annually, a gap of $93 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RFEM currently yields 2.67% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 111 holdings in RFEM and 100 in SCHD, totalling 97.3% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 111 positions we hold weights for in RFEM and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 119 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 99 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for RFEM (99.9% of the fund), and 9 for RFEM that do not appear in SCHD (6.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RFEM and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RFEM or SCHD?
RFEM has an expense ratio of 0.99% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $93 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RFEM or SCHD?
Over the past year RFEM returned +40.66% vs +30.29% for SCHD, so RFEM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), RFEM annualized +9.17% vs +11.73% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RFEM or SCHD?
RFEM has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 15.1% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: RFEM -45.6% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both RFEM and SCHD?
RFEM and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, RFEM or SCHD?
RFEM yields 2.67% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than RFEM?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. RFEM led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, SCHD over the full window. RFEM is less concentrated, with 38.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.