QQQ vs RMOP
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RMOP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.80% | |
| AUM | $455.8B | $437M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 5.61% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 271 | |
| YTD Return | +18.31% | +3.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.37% | +9.42% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.79% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.20% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 5.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -6.8% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Rockefeller Capital Management | |
| Category | Equity | Tax Preferred | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Aug 12, 2024 |
QQQ vs RMOP Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF (RMOP) is a ETF from Rockefeller Capital Management. Over the past year QQQ returned +25.37% while RMOP returned +9.42%. Year to date, QQQ is up 18.31% versus a gain of 3.54% for RMOP.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 5.5% for RMOP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -6.8% for RMOP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RMOP charges 0.80%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $80 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.41% against 5.61% for RMOP.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and RMOP share 0 holdings out of 166 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RMOP?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RMOP charges 0.80%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or RMOP?
Over the past year QQQ returned +25.37% vs +9.42% for RMOP, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQ annualized +13.10% vs +4.95% for RMOP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RMOP?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 5.5% for RMOP. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs RMOP -6.8%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RMOP?
QQQ and RMOP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RMOP?
QQQ and RMOP share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 166 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RMOP?
QQQ yields 0.41% while RMOP yields 5.61%, so RMOP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.