QQQ vs RODM
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. RODM offers more diversification with 354 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RODM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.29% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $1.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 2.79% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 354 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | +15.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +23.26% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | +21.57% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | +9.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 13.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -38.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Hartford Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Feb 25, 2015 |
QQQ vs RODM Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) is a ETF from Hartford Funds. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while RODM returned +23.26%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a gain of 15.23% for RODM.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.96% per year against +21.57% for RODM; over five years the annualized figures are +14.54% and +9.96% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +6.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 13.7% for RODM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -38.3% for RODM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RODM charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $29 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 2.79% for RODM.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and RODM share 2 holdings out of 435 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RODM?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RODM charges 0.29%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or RODM?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +23.26% for RODM, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs +6.52% for RODM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RODM?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 13.7% for RODM. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs RODM -38.3%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RODM?
QQQ and RODM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RODM?
QQQ and RODM share 2 common holdings with a 0.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 435 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RODM?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RODM yields 2.79%, so RODM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.