QQQ vs RQI
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund Inc
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. RQI offers more diversification with 208 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RQI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 3.45% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $1,620.47 | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 8.50% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 208 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | +14.34% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +10.09% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | +12.76% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | +3.59% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 33.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -94.1% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Cohen & Steers Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Feb 28, 2002 |
QQQ vs RQI Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund Inc (RQI) is a ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while RQI returned +10.09%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a gain of 14.34% for RQI.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.96% per year against +12.76% for RQI; over five years the annualized figures are +14.54% and +3.59% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +1.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RQI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.2% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -94.1% for RQI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RQI charges 3.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $345 annually, a gap of $327 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 8.50% for RQI.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and RQI share 0 holdings out of 272 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RQI?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RQI charges 3.45%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $327 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or RQI?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +10.09% for RQI, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs +1.07% for RQI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RQI?
RQI has been the more volatile fund at 33.2% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs RQI -94.1%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RQI?
QQQ and RQI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RQI?
QQQ and RQI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 272 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RQI?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RQI yields 8.50%, so RQI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.