IVV vs RQI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund Inc
Which is better, IVV or RQI?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RQI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 3.45% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $1,620.47 |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 8.96% |
| Holdings | 508 | 208 |
| YTD Return | +11.03%Best | +6.26% |
| 1Y Return | +15.62%Best | +0.93% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.81%Best | +9.75% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.61%Best | +1.62% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.9%Best | 33.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5%Best | -94.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,109Best | $10,837 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Cohen & Steers Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 28, 2002 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 27, 2002 to Sep 16, 2026 (24.6 years).
IVV vs RQI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 24.6 years both funds cover.
IVV vs RQI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund Inc (RQI) is an ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +15.62% while RQI returned +0.93%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.03% versus a gain of 6.26% for RQI.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.81% per year against +9.75% for RQI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.61% and +1.62% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +8.45% annualized vs +0.77%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RQI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.2% compared with 14.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -94.1% for RQI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RQI charges 3.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $345 annually, a gap of $342 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 8.96% for RQI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 2.5% of IVV's money is in holdings RQI also owns.
Only one direction is shown: for RQI, our book for it lists positions totalling 138.2% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.
IVV and RQI share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 153 days apart, IVV as of Aug 31, 2026 and RQI as of Mar 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
22 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 170 in RQI, against full books of 508 and 208.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in RQI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WELLWelltower, Inc. | 0.25% | 17.16% | 16.91% |
| DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc. | 0.10% | 10.71% | 10.61% |
| AMTAmerican Tower Corporation | 0.12% | 8.41% | 8.29% |
| CCICrown Castle International Corp | 0.05% | 6.89% | 6.84% |
| PLDPrologis Inc | 0.20% | 6.49% | 6.29% |
| EQIXEquinix Inc. Real Estate Investment Trust | 0.16% | 4.71% | 4.55% |
| EXRExtra Space Storage Inc. | 0.04% | 4.75% | 4.71% |
| KIMKimco Realty Corp. | 0.02% | 4.33% | 4.31% |
| IRMIron Mtn Inc New Com Npv | 0.05% | 4.13% | 4.08% |
| SPGSimon Property Group Inc | 0.10% | 3.29% | 3.19% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and RQI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RQI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RQI charges 3.45%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $342 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or RQI?
Over the past year IVV returned +15.62% vs +0.93% for RQI, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), IVV annualized +8.45% vs +0.77% for RQI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or RQI?
RQI has been the more volatile fund at 33.2% annualized versus 14.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RQI -94.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and RQI?
IVV and RQI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RQI?
At least 2.5% of IVV's money is in holdings RQI also owns. Our book for RQI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 170 in RQI.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RQI?
IVV yields 1.06% while RQI yields 8.96%, so RQI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RQI better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.