QQQ vs RSSY
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. RSSY delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RSSY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.99% | |
| AUM | $455.8B | $93M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 29 | |
| YTD Return | +17.46% | +33.74% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.02% | +35.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.51% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.12% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 16.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -29.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Return Stacked ETF | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | May 28, 2024 |
QQQ vs RSSY Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY) is a ETF from Return Stacked ETF. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.02% while RSSY returned +35.92%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.46% versus a gain of 33.74% for RSSY.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 16.9% for RSSY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -29.6% for RSSY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RSSY charges 0.99%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $99 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.41% against 0.00% for RSSY.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and RSSY share 0 holdings out of 105 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RSSY?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RSSY charges 0.99%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $81 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or RSSY?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.02% vs +35.92% for RSSY, so RSSY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQ annualized +13.08% vs +12.06% for RSSY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RSSY?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 16.9% for RSSY. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs RSSY -29.6%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RSSY?
QQQ and RSSY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RSSY?
QQQ and RSSY share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 105 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RSSY?
QQQ yields 0.41% while RSSY yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.