QQQ vs RWR
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs State Street SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RWR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.25% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $1.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 3.26% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 103 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | +18.00% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | +13.04% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | +4.31% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 43.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -77.0% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Apr 23, 2001 |
QQQ vs RWR Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while RWR returned +21.63%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a gain of 18.00% for RWR.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.96% per year against +13.04% for RWR; over five years the annualized figures are +14.54% and +4.31% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +9.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RWR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 43.9% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -77.0% for RWR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.26. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RWR charges 0.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $25 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 3.26% for RWR.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and RWR share 0 holdings out of 201 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RWR?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RWR charges 0.25%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $7 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or RWR?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +21.63% for RWR, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs +9.95% for RWR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RWR?
RWR has been the more volatile fund at 43.9% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs RWR -77.0%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RWR?
QQQ and RWR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.26, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RWR?
QQQ and RWR share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 201 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RWR?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RWR yields 3.26%, so RWR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.