RWR vs VXUS
State Street SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RWR | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $2.0B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.35% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 103 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +18.39% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.47% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.66% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.26% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 43.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -77.0% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 23, 2001 | Jan 26, 2011 |
RWR vs VXUS Performance
State Street SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RWR returned +23.47% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, RWR is up 18.39% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, RWR compounded at +11.66% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +4.26% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, RWR has the edge at +9.98% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RWR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 43.9% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -77.0% for RWR and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RWR charges 0.25% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $5 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RWR currently yields 3.35% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
RWR and VXUS share 1 holdings out of 7959 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RWR | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| EGP | 1.05% | 0.00% | 1.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RWR or VXUS?
RWR has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $20 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RWR or VXUS?
Over the past year RWR returned +23.47% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), RWR annualized +9.98% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RWR or VXUS?
RWR has been the more volatile fund at 43.9% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: RWR -77.0% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both RWR and VXUS?
RWR and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RWR and VXUS?
RWR and VXUS share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7959 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RWR or VXUS?
RWR yields 3.35% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so RWR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.