QQQ vs RWX
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs State Street SPDR Dow Jones International Real Estate ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. RWX offers more diversification with 144 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RWX | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.59% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $266M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 3.83% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 144 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | +0.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +4.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | +8.14% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | -1.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 19.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -75.2% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Dec 15, 2006 |
QQQ vs RWX Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones International Real Estate ETF (RWX) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while RWX returned +4.12%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a gain of 0.57% for RWX.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.96% per year against +8.14% for RWX; over five years the annualized figures are +14.54% and -1.96% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs -2.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 19.5% for RWX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -75.2% for RWX. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RWX charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $59 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 3.83% for RWX.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and RWX share 0 holdings out of 228 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RWX?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RWX charges 0.59%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or RWX?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +4.12% for RWX, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs -2.83% for RWX. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RWX?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 19.5% for RWX. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs RWX -75.2%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RWX?
QQQ and RWX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RWX?
QQQ and RWX share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 228 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RWX?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RWX yields 3.83%, so RWX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.