QQQ vs SDCI
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. SDCI delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SDCI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.60% | |
| AUM | $455.8B | $570M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 3.09% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 23 | |
| YTD Return | +17.85% | +32.85% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.45% | +38.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.07% | +21.56% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.16% | +21.62% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 16.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -45.8% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | USCF Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Commodity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | May 3, 2018 |
QQQ vs SDCI Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) is a ETF from USCF Investments. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.45% while SDCI returned +38.78%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.85% versus a gain of 32.85% for SDCI.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +26.07% per year against +21.56% for SDCI; over five years the annualized figures are +15.16% and +21.62% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.09% annualized vs +11.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 16.6% for SDCI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -45.8% for SDCI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.13. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SDCI charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $60 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.41% against 3.09% for SDCI.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and SDCI share 0 holdings out of 106 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SDCI?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SDCI charges 0.60%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or SDCI?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.45% vs +38.78% for SDCI, so SDCI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), QQQ annualized +13.09% vs +11.73% for SDCI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SDCI?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 16.6% for SDCI. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs SDCI -45.8%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SDCI?
QQQ and SDCI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.13, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and SDCI?
QQQ and SDCI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 106 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SDCI?
QQQ yields 0.41% while SDCI yields 3.09%, so SDCI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.