QQQ vs SETH
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs ProShares Short Ether ETF
Which is better, QQQ or SETH?
Large Cap Growth against Multi Alternative.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SETH |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.95% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 29.99% |
| Holdings | 107 | 1 |
| YTD Return | +17.95%Best | -6.40% |
| 1Y Return | +21.77%Best | +21.07% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.63%Best | -38.82% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.24% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8%Best | 66.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.8%Best | -80.8% |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $20,280Best | $2,405 |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | ProShares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Nov 2, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 2, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.9 years).
QQQ vs SETH growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs SETH Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and ProShares Short Ether ETF (SETH) is an ETF from ProShares. Over the past year QQQ returned +21.77% while SETH returned +21.07%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.95% versus a loss of 6.40% for SETH.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.63% per year against -38.82% for SETH.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SETH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 66.5% compared with 16.8% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for QQQ and -80.8% for SETH. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.37. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SETH charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $95 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 29.99% for SETH.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and SETH you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SETH?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SETH charges 0.95%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $77 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or SETH?
Over the past year QQQ returned +21.77% vs +21.07% for SETH, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SETH?
SETH has been the more volatile fund at 66.5% annualized versus 16.8% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -22.8% vs SETH -80.8%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SETH?
QQQ and SETH have a monthly-return correlation of -0.37, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SETH?
QQQ yields 0.44% while SETH yields 29.99%, so SETH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SETH better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.