QQQ vs SGDJ
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. SGDJ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SGDJ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.50% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $341M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 9.55% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 31 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | +21.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +103.88% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | +65.14% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | +25.91% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 41.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -59.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Sprott ETFS | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Mar 31, 2015 |
QQQ vs SGDJ Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) is a ETF from Sprott ETFS. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while SGDJ returned +103.88%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a gain of 21.07% for SGDJ.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.96% per year against +65.14% for SGDJ; over five years the annualized figures are +14.54% and +25.91% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, SGDJ has the edge at +16.46% annualized vs +13.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SGDJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 41.2% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -59.3% for SGDJ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.26. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SGDJ charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $50 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 9.55% for SGDJ.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and SGDJ share 0 holdings out of 132 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SGDJ?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SGDJ charges 0.50%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or SGDJ?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +103.88% for SGDJ, so SGDJ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs +16.46% for SGDJ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SGDJ?
SGDJ has been the more volatile fund at 41.2% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs SGDJ -59.3%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SGDJ?
QQQ and SGDJ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.26, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and SGDJ?
QQQ and SGDJ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 132 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SGDJ?
QQQ yields 0.44% while SGDJ yields 9.55%, so SGDJ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.