QQQ vs SRS
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs ProShares UltraShort Real Estate
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SRS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.95% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $16M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 3.65% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 8 | |
| YTD Return | +19.52% | -21.37% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.68% | -19.47% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.64% | -15.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.36% | -5.92% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 40.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -100.0% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | ProShares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jan 30, 2007 |
QQQ vs SRS Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) is a ETF from ProShares. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.68% while SRS returned -19.47%. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.52% versus a loss of 21.37% for SRS.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +26.64% per year against -15.64% for SRS; over five years the annualized figures are +15.36% and -5.92% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.14% annualized vs -28.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 40.9% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -100.0% for SRS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SRS charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $95 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 3.65% for SRS.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and SRS share 0 holdings out of 103 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SRS?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SRS charges 0.95%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or SRS?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.68% vs -19.47% for SRS, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), QQQ annualized +13.14% vs -28.77% for SRS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SRS?
SRS has been the more volatile fund at 40.9% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs SRS -100.0%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SRS?
QQQ and SRS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and SRS?
QQQ and SRS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 103 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SRS?
QQQ yields 0.44% while SRS yields 3.65%, so SRS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.