SCHD vs SRS
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs ProShares UltraShort Real Estate
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | SRS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.95% | |
| AUM | $103.7B | $15M | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.31% | 3.49% | |
| Holdings | 104 | 8 | |
| YTD Return | +24.26% | -20.41% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.38% | -16.10% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.08% | -14.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.72% | -5.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.6% | 40.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4% | -100.0% | |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | ProShares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Jan 30, 2007 |
SCHD vs SRS Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) is a ETF from ProShares. Over the past year SCHD returned +31.38% while SRS returned -16.10%. Year to date, SCHD is up 24.26% versus a loss of 20.41% for SRS.
Over three years, SCHD compounded at +15.08% per year against -14.40% for SRS; over five years the annualized figures are +9.72% and -5.84% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.39% annualized vs -28.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 40.9% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for SCHD and -100.0% for SRS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while SRS charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $95 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.31% against 3.49% for SRS.
Holdings Overlap
SCHD and SRS share 0 holdings out of 101 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or SRS?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while SRS charges 0.95%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $89 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SCHD or SRS?
Over the past year SCHD returned +31.38% vs -16.10% for SRS, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), SCHD annualized +11.39% vs -28.75% for SRS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SCHD or SRS?
SRS has been the more volatile fund at 40.9% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: SCHD -33.4% vs SRS -100.0%.
Should I hold both SCHD and SRS?
SCHD and SRS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and SRS?
SCHD and SRS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 101 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or SRS?
SCHD yields 3.31% while SRS yields 3.49%, so SRS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.