QQQ vs TJUN
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | TJUN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.95% | |
| AUM | $455.8B | $7M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +17.85% | -0.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.45% | +8.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.07% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.16% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 8.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -9.8% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jun 20, 2025 |
QQQ vs TJUN Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year QQQ returned +26.45% while TJUN returned +8.19%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.85% versus a loss of 0.52% for TJUN.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 8.0% for TJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -9.8% for TJUN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while TJUN charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $95 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.41% against 0.00% for TJUN.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and TJUN share 0 holdings out of 104 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or TJUN?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while TJUN charges 0.95%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or TJUN?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.45% vs +8.19% for TJUN, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QQQ annualized +13.09% vs +10.67% for TJUN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or TJUN?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 8.0% for TJUN. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs TJUN -9.8%.
Should I hold both QQQ and TJUN?
QQQ and TJUN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and TJUN?
QQQ and TJUN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 104 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or TJUN?
QQQ yields 0.41% while TJUN yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.