QQQ vs UBRL

QQQ vs UBRL

Which is better, QQQ or UBRL?

Large Cap Growth against Leverage Strategy.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQUBRL
Expense Ratio0.18%Best1.15%
AUM$483.5B$22M
Dividend Yield0.44%14.02%
Holdings1072
YTD Return+16.87%Best-35.44%
1Y Return+22.98%Best-53.13%
3Y Return (annualized)+24.98%-
5Y Return (annualized)+14.39%-
Volatility (annualized)18.6%Best50.1%
Max Drawdown-22.8%Best-62.8%
$10,000 over 2 years$15,620Best$6,315
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)GraniteShares
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLeverage Strategy
InceptionMar 10, 1999Sep 3, 2024

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 4, 2024 to Sep 11, 2026 (2 years).

QQQ vs UBRL growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.

QQQ vs UBRL Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and GraniteShares 2x Long UBER Daily ETF (UBRL) is an ETF from GraniteShares. Over the past year QQQ returned +22.98% while UBRL returned -53.13%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.87% versus a loss of 35.44% for UBRL.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

UBRL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 50.1% compared with 18.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for QQQ and -62.8% for UBRL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.27. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while UBRL charges 1.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $115 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 14.02% for UBRL.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 102 holdings in QQQ and 1 in UBRL, totalling 99.9% and 66.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 1 in UBRL, against full books of 107 and 2.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of QQQ and UBRL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

QQQUBRL

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or UBRL?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while UBRL charges 1.15%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $97 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, QQQ or UBRL?

Over the past year QQQ returned +22.98% vs -53.13% for UBRL, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQ annualized +24.98% vs -20.53% for UBRL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, QQQ or UBRL?

UBRL has been the more volatile fund at 50.1% annualized versus 18.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -22.8% vs UBRL -62.8%.

Should I hold both QQQ and UBRL?

QQQ and UBRL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.27, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or UBRL?

QQQ yields 0.44% while UBRL yields 14.02%, so UBRL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is UBRL better than QQQ?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.