QQQ vs URA
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Global X Uranium ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. URA delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | URA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.69% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $6.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 5.30% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 57 | |
| YTD Return | +16.19% | +4.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.22% | +27.72% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.47% | +32.33% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.34% | +24.88% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 37.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -93.5% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Global X by mirae Asset | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Nov 4, 2010 |
QQQ vs URA Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year QQQ returned +25.22% while URA returned +27.72%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.19% versus a gain of 4.52% for URA.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.47% per year against +32.33% for URA; over five years the annualized figures are +14.34% and +24.88% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.01% annualized vs -2.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
URA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.5% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -93.5% for URA. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while URA charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $69 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 5.30% for URA.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and URA share 0 holdings out of 147 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or URA?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while URA charges 0.69%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $51 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or URA?
Over the past year QQQ returned +25.22% vs +27.72% for URA, so URA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), QQQ annualized +13.01% vs -2.05% for URA. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or URA?
URA has been the more volatile fund at 37.5% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs URA -93.5%.
Should I hold both QQQ and URA?
QQQ and URA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and URA?
QQQ and URA share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 147 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or URA?
QQQ yields 0.44% while URA yields 5.30%, so URA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.